I blogged last year about the willingness of the Luxembourg authorities to enhance the country’s connectivity. I appended a traceroute showing the how a packet moving between two sites geographically distant of less than a kilometer from each other would actually travel through most of Europe. Not only is there no improvement to date, it is actually getting worse. Here is today’s traceroute. It goes is the other direction than last year’s.
traceroute to www.isoc.lu (158.64.14.86), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
(5 internal hops deleted)
6 147.67.224.2 (147.67.224.2) 8.301 ms 9.866 ms 14.375 ms
7 uu194-7-242-205.unknown.uunet.be (194.7.242.205) 11.214 ms 7.786 ms 8.543 ms
8 uu194-7-242-201.unknown.uunet.be (194.7.242.201) 10.411 ms 8.841 ms 9.023 ms
9 so-3-0-0.xr2.bru2.alter.net (146.188.2.121) 8.792 ms 9.223 ms 9.005 ms
10 so-1-0-0.tr2.bru2.alter.net (146.188.9.153) 11.849 ms 10.144 ms 11.786 ms
11 so-7-1-0.tr1.ams2.alter.net (146.188.15.225) 13.349 ms 12.818 ms 12.397 ms
12 pos1-0.br1.ams3.alter.net (146.188.3.214) 12.849 ms 13.775 ms 12.857 ms
13 pos4-0.core2.amsterdam.level3.net (146.188.67.202) 15.719 ms 12.937 ms 12.696 ms
14 so-4-0-0.mp2.amsterdam1.level3.net (4.68.113.82) 13.680 ms 13.982 ms 12.900 ms
15 ae-1-0.bbr1.frankfurt1.level3.net (212.187.128.30) 23.811 ms as-1-0.bbr2.frankfurt1.level3.net (212.187.128.97) 23.178 ms ae-1-0.bbr1.frankfurt1.level3.net (212.187.128.30) 23.395 ms
16 ae-31-53.ebr1.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.68.118.94) 33.517 ms ae-32-56.ebr2.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.68.118.190) 23.688 ms ae-31-55.ebr1.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.68.118.158) 23.166 ms
17 ae-4-4.car2.milan1.level3.net (4.69.133.137) 32.141 ms 31.910 ms ae-1-100.ebr2.frankfurt1.level3.net (4.69.132.126) 29.827 ms
18 dante.car2.milan1.level3.net (213.242.65.26) 32.716 ms ae-4-4.car2.milan1.level3.net (4.69.133.137) 32.112 ms dante.car2.milan1.level3.net (213.242.65.26) 32.570 ms
19 dante.car2.milan1.level3.net (213.242.65.142) 33.288 ms so-6-3-0.rt1.gen.ch.geant2.net (62.40.112.33) 51.075 ms dante.car2.milan1.level3.net (213.242.65.142) 42.808 ms
20 so-6-3-0.rt1.gen.ch.geant2.net (62.40.112.33) 38.728 ms so-7-2-0.rt1.fra.de.geant2.net (62.40.112.22) 37.665 ms so-6-3-0.rt1.gen.ch.geant2.net (62.40.112.33) 37.290 ms
21 so-1-3-0.rt1.lux.lu.geant2.net (62.40.112.54) 41.656 ms 43.051 ms so-7-2-0.rt1.fra.de.geant2.net (62.40.112.22) 37.016 ms
22 restena-gw.rt1.lux.lu.geant2.net (62.40.124.150) 43.677 ms so-1-3-0.rt1.lux.lu.geant2.net (62.40.112.54) 42.767 ms 42.155 ms
23 gate-2-v33.bce.restena.lu (158.64.16.38) 42.558 ms restena-gw.rt1.lux.lu.geant2.net (62.40.124.150) 48.978 ms gate-2-v33.bce.restena.lu (158.64.16.38) 51.384 ms
24 gate-1-v26.rest.restena.lu (158.64.16.218) 47.132 ms gate-2-v33.bce.restena.lu (158.64.16.38) 44.242 ms gate-1-v26.rest.restena.lu (158.64.16.218) 43.795 ms
25 gate-1-v26.rest.restena.lu (158.64.16.218) 44.614 ms 44.706 ms boaz (158.64.14.86) 43.837 ms !<10>
26 www.isoc.lu (158.64.14.86) 42.866 ms !<10> 42.585 ms !<10> 41.996 ms !<10>
This time we go from Luxembourg to Brussels, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Milan and Geneva and finally back at home. 15 hops last year. 21 this year.
Much of the blame goes to Verizon, who consistenly declined to peer at the local internet Exchange, citing the fact that the peering vould be very uneven.


Recent Comments