.XXX and conservative groups

12 May 2006  |  Published in ICANN  |  1 Comment

By now, you should have read elsewhere that the ICANN board has rejected the ICM application to create a .XXX TLD.

It still comes as a surprise to some. Frankly, this was the prognosis I made to Stuart Lawley two years ago, for the very reasons mentioned by the European Commission. I mentioned in a previous blog entry that 6000 complaints from US citizens would have more weight on the conservative US administration than any other consideration. Had the ICANN board approved .XXX, I bet that it would have been blocked by the DoC at a later stage, ie in the IANA-DoC-Verisign root zone update process.

This is clearly a political decision by ICANN. Rather than restrict itself to its role of keeping the security and stability of the domain name system, ICANN went on to examine irrelevant criteria, like how the porn industry supported the initiative. It would have been ICM’s right to try and sell .XXX TLDs with or without a potential market. It is not up to ICANN to decide if a business plan makes sense or not. The only thing ICANN should care about is that the registry should be able to run the TLD from a technical point of view until the end of the contract. Whether it is successful or not is not ICANN’s business.

Again, I am not convinced that .XXX would have allowed to corral the porn sites in a specific domain and might have helped in any way to prevent anyone from viewing porn. The filters set up by the governments of China or Saudi Arabia are much more efficient. On a side note, they are also more efficient than labelling initiatives like ICRA. This web site has been labelled with ICRA, but after one year, I have yet to see any visiting browser actually using that label.

Update: This article is also featured on CircleID

Share on Facebook   Share on Twitter

Responses

  1. Develops.mobi » .XXX is Back on the Radar Screen says:

    9 January 2007 at 3:54 (#)

    [...] Internet Zombies – Today on Dave Farber’s IP list, someone revived the ancient argument that ICANN imposes limits on the number of top level domains (TLDs) because to have more than a few will cause DNS to wobble and cause the internet to collapse. Although long discredited, that argument hangs around like a zombie. ICANN has never been able to adduce a shred of proof that there is anything to support that assertion… more….XXX is Back on the Radar Screen – The DoC seems to have finally realized it went too far by using ICANN to serve the interests of some conservative groups, as mentioned in a previous post. The new story is now that the ICANN board did not reject the .XXX application as such, but only the agreement negotiated between ICM Registry and the ICANN staff at that time. How subtle these things are… more…The .travel Sponsored Rickshaw Run is Underway – Living up to each adventure travelers’ expectations, the first-ever .travel sponsored Rickshaw Run is providing more thrills than participants had imagined. more…Resignation of Public Interest Registry President and CEO Announcement – Viltz has been the organization’s president and CEO since February 2003. Effective 1 January 2007, Eva Frölich, chair of the PIR board of directors, will serve as acting CEO until a replacement is named. more…Earthquake in Asia, Spam Plummets – An earthquake on Tuesday near Taiwan caused widespread disruption to telephone and Internet networks. The quake affected an area of the sea bottom with a lot of undersea cables that broke, and since there is only a limited number of cable repair ships, it will take at least weeks to fish them up and splice them. more… [...]

Leave a Response

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

You're just using IPv4. Your address is 38.107.191.111.

Disclaimer

This site does not reflect the views of my employer, nor that of the Internet Society or its Luxembourg chapter

SPF and DKIM adoption rate

  • E-mails reaching this server on 1 Aug 2010
    SPF enabled e-mails: 2.85%
    DKIM signed e-mails: 2.45%
    DKIM signed mails sent: 60

My Twitter feed

Archives



Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional