Linksys != Cisco

28 June 2009  |  Published in Internet  |  1 Comment

I just bought a Linksys WAG160N ADSL modem/router that I am going to bring back to the retail store. The main reason it that it will not connect to my Nokia E61i phone on anything more than the old-fashioned (and insecure) WEP. My phone works fine with WPA2 on real Cisco APs; it also works with competing products, including the AVM Fritz!Box that was using earlier – and was partially destroyed by a thunder strike on the street telephone cabinet where my DSL phone line connects.  My phone just does not work with the Linksys WAG160N. This is actually a known issue that I found out too late. however, it does not seem to be solved and no indication shows that it was acknowledged, even less on the way to be fixed.

I work with a lot of Cisco products in my day job. I have the pleasure to know many folks at Cisco. Most of them were telling me that Linksys somehow usurpts the Cisco label with inferior quality products. How right they were. I should have listened to what  Cisco’s own staff was telling me.

My online chat with the Linksys support staff did not resolve the issue. WEP works, but who dares to use WEP these days ? My advice to John Chambers and all those at Cisco who care about the company image is to stop your subsidiary from using the Cisco name.

Share on Facebook   Share on Twitter

Responses

  1. AboAhmed says:

    30 October 2009 at 22:10 (#)

    I have the same problem. is there any way around it at this time?

Leave a Response

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

You're just using IPv4. Your address is 38.107.191.113.

Disclaimer

This site does not reflect the views of my employer, nor that of the Internet Society or its Luxembourg chapter

SPF and DKIM adoption rate

  • E-mails reaching this server on 1 Aug 2010
    SPF enabled e-mails: 2.85%
    DKIM signed e-mails: 2.45%
    DKIM signed mails sent: 60

My Twitter feed

Archives



Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional