
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WGIG summary of replies to the questionnaire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patrick.vande-walle.eu/internet/wgig-summary-of-replies-to-the-questionnaire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patrick.vande-walle.eu/internet/wgig-summary-of-replies-to-the-questionnaire/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wgig-summary-of-replies-to-the-questionnaire</link>
	<description>Random thoughts about the Internet and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:33:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Next Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Blurr-Cade proposal on root zone oversight</title>
		<link>http://patrick.vande-walle.eu/internet/wgig-summary-of-replies-to-the-questionnaire/comment-page-1/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>The Next Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Blurr-Cade proposal on root zone oversight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 06:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isoc.lu/2005/06/04/wgig-summary-of-replies-to-the-questionnaire/#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>[...] All in all, I would personally support this proposal as a starting point for discussions. It is incidentally close to a reply to a WSIS questionnaire last year, in which I suggested that the oversight on the root should be done by a sub-committee of the GAC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All in all, I would personally support this proposal as a starting point for discussions. It is incidentally close to a reply to a WSIS questionnaire last year, in which I suggested that the oversight on the root should be done by a sub-committee of the GAC. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

